The Rat is Always Right
- Tori Leto

- Sep 16
- 2 min read
“The rat is always right” comes from B.F. Skinner’s work on operant conditioning. The principle reminds us that a subject’s behavior is never about stubbornness or lack of intelligence. It is a reflection of the training, cues, and environment it has been exposed to. If the rat does not respond as expected, the responsibility falls on the scientist to reconsider the reinforcements and conditions, not to blame the animal. At its core, the phrase is about humility. Behavior is shaped by its consequences, and the experimenter must look inward at methodology rather than outward at the learner’s flaws.
Translating Science into Leadership
For leaders, educators, and social workers, this principle is more than a scientific observation. The people we serve are the “rats” in the maze. Their choices, challenges, and strengths represent reality, not our assumptions, theories, or carefully drawn plans.
It is uncomfortable to admit when the evidence does not match our expectations. It feels easier to argue with the data than to confront the fact that our design may not be working. Yet the question remains: what do we do with the truth we are given?
Do we redesign the maze so it actually works?
Do we shift our leadership style in response to feedback?
Do we let the voices of those we serve reshape our programs and services?
Holding Both Roles
I often ask myself: am I the rat, or am I the scientist? The answer is both. At times, I am the scientist, setting direction, building systems, and anticipating outcomes. Other times, I am the rat, moving through structures I did not design, bumping into barriers, and offering feedback through lived experience. Leadership requires holding these roles at once. We must design with intention while also staying humble enough to accept when reality does not align with the plan.
Shared Control, Shared Responsibility
Neither the mouse nor the scientist is fully in control. The mouse cannot dictate the maze, just as the scientist cannot dictate the mouse’s choices. Progress depends on both. The scientist must design with openness, and the mouse must engage authentically. In leadership and collaboration, the same is true. We may not control the systems we inherit, nor how others respond to them, but success requires both sides to bring honesty, humility, and commitment to the process.
The Heart of the Lesson
Humility ties it all together. Leaders thrive when they allow the data and the people to speak for themselves. True impact comes from adapting to reality rather than forcing reality to adapt to us.
The lesson is simple but profound: the rat is always right. Leaders must listen, reflect, and adapt. And those within the maze must share their truth. When both responsibilities are embraced, criticism becomes collaboration, and challenges become opportunities for growth.




Comments